From: Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, jarkao2@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca
Subject: Re: 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:58:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EC50BA.6080908@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328012234.GA20465@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 05:34:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
>> The first cpu will get into __qdisc_run(), but the other
>> ones will just q->enqueue() and exit since the first cpu
>> has indicated it is processing the qdisc.
>>
>
> Indeed. Since I created the problem it's only fair that I get
> to fix it too :)
>
> [NET]: Add preemption point in qdisc_run
>
> The qdisc_run loop is currently unbounded and runs entirely
> in a softirq. This is bad as it may create an unbounded softirq
> run.
>
> This patch fixes this by calling need_resched and breaking out
> if necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
>
> Thanks,
>
Great.
In general, while the TX serialization improves performance in terms to
lock contention, wouldn't it reduce throughput since only one guy is
doing the actual TX at any given time. Wondering if it would be
worthwhile to have an enable/disable option specially for multi queue TX.
Regards
Matheos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 16:46 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X Matheos Worku
2008-03-26 17:31 ` Rick Jones
2008-03-26 20:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-26 20:26 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-26 21:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-26 21:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 10:33 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 23:18 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 23:45 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 0:02 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 0:19 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 0:34 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 1:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 1:38 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 10:29 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 11:06 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 11:29 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 12:19 ` jamal
2008-03-28 13:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 14:07 ` jamal
2008-03-28 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 23:25 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 14:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 1:58 ` Matheos Worku [this message]
2008-03-28 10:33 ` jamal
2008-03-28 17:00 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 10:38 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 13:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 13:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 14:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 14:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 15:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 15:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-29 1:06 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-29 9:11 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47EC50BA.6080908@sun.com \
--to=matheos.worku@sun.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).