From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.26 1/5][SOCK]: Enumerate struct proto-s to facilitate percpu inuse accounting.
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:17:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47ECC5D5.4040208@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ECBDDB.2040203@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov a écrit :
>> This add the inuse_idx to struct proto and generates one in proto_register.
>> The ++ in generator is protected with write-locked proto_list_lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>>
>> ---
>> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
>> net/core/sock.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 1c9d059..abc6341 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ struct proto {
>>
>> /* Keeping track of sockets in use */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> + unsigned int inuse_idx;
>> struct pcounter inuse;
>> #endif
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
>> index 3ee9506..a7faf30 100644
>> --- a/net/core/sock.c
>> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
>> @@ -1940,6 +1940,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_common_release);
>> static DEFINE_RWLOCK(proto_list_lock);
>> static LIST_HEAD(proto_list);
>>
>> +static void assign_proto_idx(struct proto *prot)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> + static unsigned int idx = 0;
>> +
>>
> I believe some protocols can be registered, then unregistered, then
> re-registered (module loads, unloads, ...)
Well yes :) I found this soon after I'd sent this set.
If you don't have other objections I'll send the v2 do Dave.
> So you probably want to use a bitmap instead of a counter that will
> eventually reach PROTO_INUSE_NR
>
> assign_proto_idx() should find a zero bit, and you should free this bit
> at proto_unregister() time
>
>> + prot->inuse_idx = idx++;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
>> {
>> char *request_sock_slab_name = NULL;
>> @@ -2000,6 +2009,7 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
>>
>> write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
>> list_add(&prot->node, &proto_list);
>> + assign_proto_idx(prot);
>> write_unlock(&proto_list_lock);
>> return 0;
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 8:59 [PATCH net-2.6.26 1/5][SOCK]: Enumerate struct proto-s to facilitate percpu inuse accounting Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-28 9:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-03-28 10:17 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47ECC5D5.4040208@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).