From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] [2.6.26 / RFC] e1000: remove PCI Express device IDs Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:08:31 -0400 Message-ID: <47F5E1FF.4030005@garzik.org> References: <20080328174146.11857.94690.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <47EDA6CD.50308@garzik.org> <47F12E2C.9010800@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org To: "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58909 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948AbYDDIIe (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:08:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47F12E2C.9010800@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kok, Auke wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Auke Kok wrote: >>> We do not want to prolong the situation much longer that e1000 >>> and e1000e support these devices at the same time. As a result, >>> take out the bandage that was added for the interim period >>> and remove all the PCI Express device IDs from e1000. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok >>> Cc: Linus Torvalds >>> Cc: Jeff Garzik >>> --- >>> >>> drivers/net/Kconfig | 3 --- >>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 33 --------------------------------- >>> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) >> I'm certainly fine with this for 2.6.26. >> >> Do we need to make a public "move to e1000e" announcement, or were the >> previous threads sufficient? :) > > I'm OK with that and will write one such thing to lkml+netdev during the next > merge window. ok? I'd say write one sooner rather than later... :) "this is coming"