From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:21:39 -0400 Message-ID: <47FB7F73.9020502@garzik.org> References: <47F69965.7030303@intel.com> <20080408083606.GA20863@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kok, Auke" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , NetDev , e1000-list , linux-pci maillist , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Jesse Brandeburg , "Ronciak, John" , "Allan, Bruce W" , Greg KH , Arjan van de Ven , "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:42392 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752495AbYDHOVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:21:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080408083606.GA20863@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ingo Molnar wrote: > ( sidenote: isnt there some facility that selects the "better" driver in > case there is an overlap between PCI IDs - with the ability for users > to override that selection? ) No. Multiple PCI IDs in the same driver creates all sorts of problems, because it becomes an ambiguious selection where automated tools cannot make a choice for you. Each one typically requires special case code in relevant distro installers, hardware detectors, and similar gadgets, since the normal modules.pcimap stuff doesn't work due to the duplicate IDs. We have no way to export which is the "preferred" driver -- and indeed in many cases, that's an impossible task, since the "preferred" driver for a user sometimes depends on the hardware's programmed mode rather than just a choice. Jeff