From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
e1000-list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: showing which hardware is unclaimed
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:13:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FBD1CD.6090009@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080408200417.GI11962@parisc-linux.org>
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>Btw., a sidenote: this is another generally annoying property of Linux:
>>there's no easy and user-visible enumeration of PCI IDs (devices) that
>>we _could_ support but dont enable for some reason. It is a royal PITA
>>to track down when some driver decides to (silently) ignore a piece of
>>hardware.
>>
>>Having a seemingly dead piece of hardware component is one of the most
>>frustrating user experiences possible - the first instinctive reaction
>>is "did my hw break???". The kernel should proactively know about all
>>inactive pieces of hardware and should have a one-stop-shop for users
>>where they can reassure themselves which devices are not active and why.
>
>
> It's almost trivial to add new string attributes to sysfs. We could
> have a file, say, /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:07:03.0/broken which
> lspci could read to see if anything's left a message for us.
>
> Is that the kind of thing you had in mind?
FWIW, this is what a command on "another OS" does with an unclaimed card:
# ioscan -fk -C lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
====================================================================
lan 0 0/0/3/0 intl100 CLAIMED INTERFACE Intel PCI Pro
10/100Tx Server Adapter
lan 1 0/1/2/0 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI
1000Base-T Core
lan 2 0/2/1/0 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A7012-60001
PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Adapter
lan 3 0/2/1/1 iether CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A7012-60001
PCI/PCI-X 1000Base-T Dual-port Adapter
lan 4 0/3/1/0 ixgbe UNCLAIMED UNKNOWN PCI-X Ethernet
(17d55831)
I'd probably call that "unclaimed" rather than "broken" but that may
just be a preference thing.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 21:11 [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:31 ` Dave Hansen
2008-04-04 21:49 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 14:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 16:18 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 18:39 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:56 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:47 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 19:38 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:50 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 20:12 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 18:29 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 21:23 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-10 21:52 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 7:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-11 0:46 ` Philip Craig
2008-04-11 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 16:22 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 17:26 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 17:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 19:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 19:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-11 19:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 20:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 21:01 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-11 22:06 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 22:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:05 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 23:15 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:58 ` david
2008-04-12 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-13 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-13 21:34 ` Ondrej Zary
2008-06-09 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 17:10 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-09 20:49 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Frans Pop
2008-04-09 23:59 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 9:57 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 14:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 17:55 ` Grant Grundler
2008-04-10 18:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-10 18:26 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:20 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-10 19:27 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 21:35 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-08 20:31 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 15:40 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-11 19:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-10 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-04-11 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:43 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-04-08 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:12 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:36 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:39 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:13 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-04-08 20:35 ` showing which hardware is unclaimed Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:17 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:08 ` [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FBD1CD.6090009@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).