Re: VLAN & ARP requests fail for ARM EABI (2.6.24)

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Gertjan Hofman wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
> 
> Since the VLAN mailing list is closed, its author suggested I post here. 
> We have an ARM920T processor based system. When compiling the kernel 2.6.24 using OABI (and appropiate 4.1.1 cross toolchain), VLAN functionality is fine. When setting the CONFIG_EABI flag and using  the 4.2.2 toolchain (created by the OpenEmbedded project) a VLAN device fails to respond.
> 
> When pinging through the ARM VLAN device to a (PC based) VLAN device, the following is seen in the vlan driver:
> The ping request is sent out, followed by an ARP request. The PC returns the ARP reply and it is seen by the VLAN driver (vlan_skb_recv) which calls netif_rx(). This repeats a couple of pings later i.e. the arp reply is not used or received properly.
> 
> Similarly, when pinging from the PC, the ARP request is seen by vlan_skb_recv() but there is no ARP reply from the ARM cascading through the vlan driver.
> 
> It seems to me that either the issue is with the code that handles the ARP request when compiling in EABI format, or that VLAN doesnt process the frame properly and sends it on incorrectly. Recompile the kernel with OABI and everything is fine.
> 
> Note that communication works fine on either OABI or EABI when using 'normal' devices (eth0 etc). This puts the suspicion back on vlan.
> 
> 
> Since EABI changes structure packing and other things, I suspect the cause is some networking code that knows a bit too much about its size & packing.
> 
> I am happy to troubleshoot, but I am no kernel expert. Tips would be appreciated. Like how to dump the sbk buffer in both cases..


I actually have no idea about the differences between
OABI and EABI, but I know a mix of both broke some
iptables setups (kernel EABI/userspace OABI or something
like that). Could you fetch the latest iproute and try
again with adding your VLANs using iproute?

The syntax is:

ip link add link <lowerdev> [name] <name> type vlan id VID

If that works the problem is most likely an inappropriate
ABI mix.