From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Yasevich Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [SCTP]: "list_for_each()" -> "list_for_each_entry()" where appropriate. Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:55:53 -0400 Message-ID: <47FE70C9.3070009@hp.com> References: <1207856394-19321-1-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> <1207856394-19321-3-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Robert P. J. Day" Return-path: Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:28251 "EHLO g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754159AbYDJT4E (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:56:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Robert P. J. Day wrote: > actually, if i remember correctly, davem rejected that change as > being too disruptive at the moment, no? > > rday > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day > Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: > Have classroom, will lecture. > > http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA > ======================================================================== > this is for 2.6.26, which should be fine. it was too disruptive for net.26. -vlad