From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
e1000-list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:22:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FF9060.5040202@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080411121606.GA25661@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i dont really care _how_ this gets solved - i'm not maintaining this
> code. What forced me to deal with it was this outright denial of my
> problem, the ridiculing and NACK-ing of it and general stonewalling.
this is a gross misrepresentation and misunderstanding. You're completely ignoring
the fact that:
(1) I debated whether it was a "regression" - in my opinion design changes that
deliberately break things are hardly worth this incredibly negative stamp
(2) I never NACK'ed your patch. I just withdrew my ack.
(3) You're stonewalling me by pretty much forcing me to completely drop the driver
split and not showing any understanding for the reason behind the split at all.
You don't provide a solution, nor does anyone, and I don't see any solution to
what you want but to completely cancel this driver split.
And I'm _not_ going to do that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-11 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 21:11 [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:31 ` Dave Hansen
2008-04-04 21:49 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-04 21:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 14:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 16:18 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 18:39 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:56 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-08 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:47 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-04-08 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 19:38 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:50 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Jeff Garzik
2008-04-09 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 20:12 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 18:29 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 21:23 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-10 21:52 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 7:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-11 0:46 ` Philip Craig
2008-04-11 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 16:22 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2008-04-11 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-11 17:26 ` Kok, Auke
2008-04-11 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 17:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 19:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 19:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-11 19:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-11 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 20:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 21:01 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-11 22:06 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 22:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:05 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-11 23:15 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 23:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 23:58 ` david
2008-04-12 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-13 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-13 21:34 ` Ondrej Zary
2008-06-09 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 17:10 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-09 20:49 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Frans Pop
2008-04-09 23:59 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 9:57 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-10 14:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 17:55 ` Grant Grundler
2008-04-10 18:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-10 18:26 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix Kok, Auke
2008-04-10 21:20 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-10 19:27 ` [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 21:35 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-08 20:31 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Kok, Auke
2008-04-09 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-11 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-11 15:40 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-11 19:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-10 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-04-11 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 19:43 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-04-08 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:12 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-08 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 20:36 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:39 ` Dan Noe
2008-04-08 20:13 ` showing which hardware is unclaimed Rick Jones
2008-04-08 20:35 ` Martin Mares
2008-04-08 20:17 ` [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration of PCI Express devices) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:08 ` [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FF9060.5040202@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).