From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:12:30 -0500 Message-ID: <47FF9BFE.5000201@freescale.com> References: <20080311171045.GB4684@localhost.localdomain> <82E8E38A-C159-4C23-BDE8-086D4429F366@kernel.crashing.org> <20080411160654.GA25506@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <47FF9665.7020403@freescale.com> <20080411170657.GA15270@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080411171109.GA16119@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080411171109.GA16119@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is > indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-) Well, that's what I was thinking. cell-index is zero-based, so UCC1 should have cell-index = <0>. Of course, this means all the code needs to change, since I think device-id is one-based. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale