From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] ethtool: allow ethtool op set_eee to set an NL extack message
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 00:22:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47a451a8-e253-460f-8e58-dfd2265a4941@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114150043.222e1eb5@kernel.org>
On 15.01.2025 00:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:28:22 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> index f711bfd75..8ee047747 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ struct ethtool_keee {
>> __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(supported);
>> __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(advertised);
>> __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(lp_advertised);
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
>> u32 tx_lpi_timer;
>> bool tx_lpi_enabled;
>> bool eee_active;
>
> :S I don't think we have a precedent for passing extack inside
> the paramter struct. I see 25 .set_eee callbacks, not crazy many.
> Could you plumb this thru as a separate argument, please?
Thought about alternatives:
struct ethtool_netdev_state may be a good candidate for passing
extack to ethtool ops. Code below does this for all "set" ops,
as a starting point. This approach may even allow us to remove
the extack argument from a number of existing ethtool ops,
incl. static functions used within these ops.
Would this approach be acceptable?
diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
index 870994cc3..28acb9224 100644
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -1171,12 +1171,14 @@ int ethtool_virtdev_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
* @rss_ctx: XArray of custom RSS contexts
* @rss_lock: Protects entries in @rss_ctx. May be taken from
* within RTNL.
+ * @extack: For passing netlink error messages
* @wol_enabled: Wake-on-LAN is enabled
* @module_fw_flash_in_progress: Module firmware flashing is in progress.
*/
struct ethtool_netdev_state {
struct xarray rss_ctx;
struct mutex rss_lock;
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
unsigned wol_enabled:1;
unsigned module_fw_flash_in_progress:1;
};
diff --git a/net/ethtool/netlink.c b/net/ethtool/netlink.c
index b4c45207f..0cc22c482 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/netlink.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/netlink.c
@@ -704,7 +704,10 @@ static int ethnl_default_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (ret < 0)
goto out_free_cfg;
+ dev->ethtool->extack = info->extack;
ret = ops->set(&req_info, info);
+ dev->ethtool->extack = NULL;
+
if (ret < 0)
goto out_ops;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-08 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 13:24 [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] net: phy: improve phylib EEE handling Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: phy: rename eee_broken_modes to eee_disabled_modes Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:27 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: phy: rename phy_set_eee_broken to phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:28 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] ethtool: allow ethtool op set_eee to set an NL extack message Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-14 23:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 12:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-15 17:46 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-15 17:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-08 23:22 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2025-02-11 0:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-12 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] net: phy: c45: improve handling of disabled EEE modes in ethtool functions Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: phy: move definition of phy_is_started before phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: phy: improve phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:32 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/10] net: phy: remove disabled EEE modes from advertising in phy_probe Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:32 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: phy: c45: Don't silently remove disabled EEE modes any longer when writing advertisement register Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:33 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: phy: c45: use cached EEE advertisement in genphy_c45_ethtool_get_eee Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/10] net: phy: c45: remove local advertisement parameter from genphy_c45_eee_is_active Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47a451a8-e253-460f-8e58-dfd2265a4941@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).