From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Noe Subject: Re: arcnet - weird printk arc%d Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: <48015CC8.4000004@isomerica.net> References: <236742536@web.de> Reply-To: dpn@isomerica.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: devzero@web.de Return-path: Received: from colobus.isomerica.net ([216.93.242.10]:57127 "EHLO colobus.isomerica.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753683AbYDMBHW (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:07:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <236742536@web.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: devzero@web.de wrote: > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd: arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0 > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd: arc%d: No autoprobe for RIM I; you must specify the shmem and irq! > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd: arc%d: No autoprobe for IO mapped cards; you must specify the base address! > > arc%d looks weird - is this intenitonal ? The %d is normally replaced by the interface number after register_netdev is called. But these error messages are printed in arcrimi_found() *before* register_netdev() is called (because the device hasn't been found yet). I'm not sure what the best approach to fixing this is. Most likely the log printouts at that point should not be using the macros that rely on dev->name being fully correct. Cheers, Dan -- /--------------- - - - - - - | Dan Noe | http://isomerica.net/~dpn/