arcnet - weird printk arc%d

arcnet - weird printk arc%d

[devzero]

Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for RIM I; you must specify the shmem and irq!
Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for IO mapped cards; you must specify the base address!

arc%d looks weird - is this intenitonal ?
_______________________________________________________________________
Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage
kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220

Re: arcnet - weird printk arc%d

[Dan Noe]

devzero@web.de wrote:
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for RIM I; you must specify the shmem and irq!
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for IO mapped cards; you must specify the base address!
> 
> arc%d looks weird - is this intenitonal ?

The %d is normally replaced by the interface number after 
register_netdev is called.  But these error messages are printed in 
arcrimi_found() *before* register_netdev() is called (because the device 
hasn't been found yet).

I'm not sure what the best approach to fixing this is.  Most likely the 
log printouts at that point should not be using the macros that rely on 
dev->name being fully correct.

Cheers,
Dan

-- 
                     /--------------- - -  -  -   -   -
                     |  Dan Noe
                     |  http://isomerica.net/~dpn/

Re: arcnet - weird printk arc%d

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:07:20 -0400
Dan Noe <dpn@isomerica.net> wrote:

> devzero@web.de wrote:
> > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
> > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for RIM I; you must specify the shmem and irq!
> > Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for IO mapped cards; you must specify the base address!
> > 
> > arc%d looks weird - is this intenitonal ?
> 
> The %d is normally replaced by the interface number after 
> register_netdev is called.  But these error messages are printed in 
> arcrimi_found() *before* register_netdev() is called (because the device 
> hasn't been found yet).
> 
> I'm not sure what the best approach to fixing this is.  Most likely the 
> log printouts at that point should not be using the macros that rely on 
> dev->name being fully correct.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan
> 

use dev_info et al, to print out using the bus id.

Re: arcnet - weird printk arc%d

[devzero]

one more:

Apr 13 01:16:41 neo klogd: eth%d: D-Link DE-600 pocket adapter: not at I/O 0x378.
Apr 13 01:16:41 neo klogd: eth%d: i82596 initialization timed out


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: <devzero@web.de>
> Gesendet: 13.04.08 02:31:16
> An: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: arcnet - weird printk arc%d

> 
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for RIM I; you must specify the shmem and irq!
> Apr 13 01:25:50 neo klogd:  arc%d: No autoprobe for IO mapped cards; you must specify the base address!
> 
> arc%d looks weird - is this intenitonal ?


_________________________________________________________________________
In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten! 
Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114