netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RESEND 8390: Split 8390 support into a pausing and a non pausing driver core
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:46:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48069DE1.7080301@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080119155817.326ee5e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

Alan Cox wrote:
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/net/8390p.c	2008-01-19 15:00:41.000000000 +0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/* 8390 core for ISA devices needing bus delays */
> +
> +static const char version[] =
> +    "8390p.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donald Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov)\n";
> +
> +#define ei_inb(_p)	inb(_p)
> +#define ei_outb(_v,_p)	outb(_v,_p)
> +#define ei_inb_p(_p)	inb_p(_p)
> +#define ei_outb_p(_v,_p) outb_p(_v,_p)
> +
> +#include "lib8390.c"
> +
> +int eip_open(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return __ei_open(dev);
> +}
> +
> +int eip_close(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return __ei_close(dev);
> +}
> +
> +irqreturn_t eip_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	return __ei_interrupt(irq, dev_id);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> +void eip_poll(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	__ei_poll(dev);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +struct net_device *__alloc_eip_netdev(int size)
> +{
> +	return ____alloc_ei_netdev(size);
> +}
> +
> +void NS8390p_init(struct net_device *dev, int startp)
> +{
> +	return __NS8390_init(dev, startp);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_open);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_close);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_interrupt);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_poll);
> +#endif
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(NS8390p_init);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_eip_netdev);
> +
> +#if defined(MODULE)
> +
> +int init_module(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void cleanup_module(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* MODULE */
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Now that this has seen a bit of testing, and accumulated some fix 
patches in -mm, can I get a roll-up of all those into a single patch?

Looks OK to me.  My one minor comment is that I would think the 
init_module() would be superfluous?

	Jeff



       reply	other threads:[~2008-04-17  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080119155817.326ee5e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
2008-04-17  0:46 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-04-17  1:05   ` [PATCH] RESEND 8390: Split 8390 support into a pausing and a non pausing driver core Andrew Morton
2008-04-17  5:32   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48069DE1.7080301@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).