From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jesse Brandeburg" Subject: Re: [2.4.32 - 2.6.15.4] e1000 - Fix mii interface Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:26:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4807377b0602271126s39285884gd0e1c51c14b5d6a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a8748490602260700s2e82a623mcf2d778aa109bb00@mail.gmail.com> <01e101c63ae7$1b417990$2001a8c0@cortex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Jesper Juhl" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cramerj@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com Return-path: To: "Paul Rolland" , "Jeff Garzik" In-Reply-To: <01e101c63ae7$1b417990$2001a8c0@cortex> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2/26/06, Paul Rolland wrote: > Hello, > > > Ok, great, I was just wondering since I would have made one if you had > > no plans to do so. > > Well, I was just waiting to make sure it was interesting for someone ;) > > Here is it, verified with tab and not spaces... but attached as my mailer > is likely to cripple anything I try to inline... > > Signed-off-by: Paul Rolland I've got an issue with this, as the same function is called in e1000_ethtool.c. I think the correct fix is to fix the caller in the mii-tool case, but I am working on verifiying my assumptions. In the meantime can you send the exact command you were having the problem with?