From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
ak@linux.intel.com, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus node numbers early
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:41:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4807377b0907140041y6c9da555lf3e1dba0775cfe7c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090710140654.32132bcb@jbarnes-g45>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Barnes<jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> From 2b51fba93f7b2dabf453a74923a9a217611ebc1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:04:30 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus node numbers early
>
> The current mp_bus_to_node array is initialized only by AMD specific
> code, since AMD platforms have registers that can be used for
> determining mode numbers. On new Intel platforms it's necessary to
> initialize this array as well though, otherwise all PCI node numbers
> will be 0, when in fact they should be -1 (indicating that I/O isn't
> tied to any particular node).
>
> So move the mp_bus_to_node code into the common PCI code, and
> initialize it early with a default value of -1. This may be overridden
> later by arch code (e.g. the AMD code).
>
> With this change, PCI consistent memory and other node specific
> allocations (e.g. skbuff allocs) should occur on the "current" node.
> If, for performance reasons, applications want to be bound to specific
> nodes, they should open their devices only after being pinned to the
> CPU where they'll run, for maximum locality.
>
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
I can confirm this works, aside from the MSI-X interrupt migration
instability (panics) that I believe are unrelated since they happen
without this patch.
I also see a pretty nice performance boost by running with this change
on a 5520 motherboard, with an 82599 10GbE forwarding packets, esp
with interrupt affinity set correctly.
I'd like to see this applied if at all possible, I think it is really
hampering I/O traffic performance due to limiting all network (among
others) memory allocation to one of the two numa nodes.
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090710104419.0032be7b@jbarnes-g45>
[not found] ` <4A57A1FE.30609@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20090710132249.1a032cfb@jbarnes-g45>
[not found] ` <20090710140654.32132bcb@jbarnes-g45>
2009-07-14 7:41 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2009-07-14 15:47 ` [PATCH] x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus node numbers early Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4807377b0907140041y6c9da555lf3e1dba0775cfe7c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox