netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAW6: Do not allow set IPV6_CHECKSUM for ICMPv6 socket
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:18:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480AEE5C.4090402@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080418.040949.87112742.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller said the following on 2008-4-18 19:09:
> From: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:32:46 +0800
> 
>> As RFC3542 mentions: An attempt to set IPV6_CHECKSUM for an
>> ICMPv6 socket will fail.
>> Add a check for that in do_rawv6_setsockopt().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Enforcing these kinds of things we've allowed for so many years is
> rather pointless, especially if it breaks real applications.  Which I
> believe it does in this case.  The standards simply do not matter.
> 
> I seem to recall that traceroute6 in iputils does exactly this.
> 

Enforcing this can forbid disabling checksum for icmpv6 socket.
The real applications, such as ping6 & traceroute6, are just doing
what is default in kernel.
Why not remove the RFC-breaking code from applications?

See the source:
kernel->rawv6_init_sk()
---
	case IPPROTO_ICMPV6:
		rp->checksum = 1;
		rp->offset   = 2;
		break;
---

ping6->main()
---
	csum_offset = 2;
	sz_opt = sizeof(int);

	err = setsockopt(icmp_sock, SOL_RAW, IPV6_CHECKSUM, &csum_offset, sz_opt);
	if (err < 0) {
		perror("setsockopt(RAW_CHECKSUM)");
		exit(2);
	}
---

traceroute6->main()
---
	on = 2;
	if (setsockopt(icmp_sock, SOL_RAW, IPV6_CHECKSUM, &on, sizeof(on)) < 0) {
		perror("setsockopt(RAW_CHECKSUM)");
		exit(2);
	}
---



  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-20  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-18 10:32 [PATCH] RAW6: Do not allow set IPV6_CHECKSUM for ICMPv6 socket Wang Chen
2008-04-18 11:09 ` David Miller
2008-04-20  7:18   ` Wang Chen [this message]
2008-04-20  7:33     ` David Miller
2008-04-20  9:18       ` Wang Chen
2008-04-20  9:38         ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2008-04-20  9:37           ` David Miller
     [not found]           ` <dd9c5f130804200342r4bdc938fq4af15c9747ba6e06@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-24 10:48             ` David Miller
2008-04-24 12:19               ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2008-04-24 15:26                 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-04-25  1:03                   ` Wang Chen
2008-04-25  4:46                     ` David Miller
2008-04-25  4:31                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480AEE5C.4090402@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).