From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:35:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4810FD32.3070701@redhat.com> References: <200804241820.m3OIKlMK017580@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20080424215858.771f718a@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org To: Alan Cox Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:56971 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753350AbYDXVgc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:36:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080424215858.771f718a@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alan Cox wrote: > Can we also get > the behaviour of flag inheritance and other stuff defined in any futu= re > API spec for this so it is consistent across platforms too - that wil= l > also let the new accept be used in the longer term to make portable c= ode > easier. If you write it down I'll bring it forward and on the agenda for standardization in the 201x revision. We are not adding new functionality in corrigendas. - -- =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro S= t =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIEP0y2ijCOnn/RHQRAh5kAJ9GRZQCfxTL9mgi/UGxzowvdyLGbQCdEvHE TmZcS+rOZcxMwpIltQYA6bI=3D =3DIKA3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----