* [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances
@ 2008-04-23 23:26 Lennert Buytenhek
2008-04-29 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lennert Buytenhek @ 2008-04-23 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dale Farnsworth, netdev; +Cc: Nicolas Pitre
This (bisectable) patch series (posted previously to netdev@ on Mar
17 and on Mar 19) allows instantiating multiple mv643xx_eth instances,
which is necessary for newer chips that contain multiple mv643xx_eth
silicon blocks, and adds support for programming mv643xx_eth's mbus
address window registers.
These five patches were not merged in the initial batch of
mv643xx_eth patches that went into 2.6.25-git because they depend
on a0916bd64a0e6636f0161480e04057c89e90c5da ("[POWERPC] mv643xx_eth:
Prepare to support multiple silicon blocks") to be merged first,
which has now been merged (via the powerpc tree.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances
2008-04-23 23:26 [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances Lennert Buytenhek
@ 2008-04-29 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-29 15:44 ` Dale Farnsworth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2008-04-29 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lennert Buytenhek; +Cc: Dale Farnsworth, netdev, Nicolas Pitre
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> This (bisectable) patch series (posted previously to netdev@ on Mar
> 17 and on Mar 19) allows instantiating multiple mv643xx_eth instances,
> which is necessary for newer chips that contain multiple mv643xx_eth
> silicon blocks, and adds support for programming mv643xx_eth's mbus
> address window registers.
>
> These five patches were not merged in the initial batch of
> mv643xx_eth patches that went into 2.6.25-git because they depend
> on a0916bd64a0e6636f0161480e04057c89e90c5da ("[POWERPC] mv643xx_eth:
> Prepare to support multiple silicon blocks") to be merged first,
> which has now been merged (via the powerpc tree.)
looks fine to me. I'll assume the maintainer will send me a pull
request or something...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances
2008-04-29 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2008-04-29 15:44 ` Dale Farnsworth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dale Farnsworth @ 2008-04-29 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Lennert Buytenhek, netdev, Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:51:30AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>> This (bisectable) patch series (posted previously to netdev@ on Mar
>> 17 and on Mar 19) allows instantiating multiple mv643xx_eth instances,
>> which is necessary for newer chips that contain multiple mv643xx_eth
>> silicon blocks, and adds support for programming mv643xx_eth's mbus
>> address window registers.
>>
>> These five patches were not merged in the initial batch of
>> mv643xx_eth patches that went into 2.6.25-git because they depend
>> on a0916bd64a0e6636f0161480e04057c89e90c5da ("[POWERPC] mv643xx_eth:
>> Prepare to support multiple silicon blocks") to be merged first,
>> which has now been merged (via the powerpc tree.)
>
> looks fine to me. I'll assume the maintainer will send me a pull
> request or something...
Yes. Coming later today.
Thanks,
-Dale
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-29 15:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-23 23:26 [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances Lennert Buytenhek
2008-04-29 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-29 15:44 ` Dale Farnsworth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).