From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, davidel@xmailserver.org,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: socket and socketpair
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 22:00:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481E9455.7030704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505.132452.98853465.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> To me, it seems overriding 2nd argument is a too ad-hoc workaround,
> and introducing new syscalls with flags is cleaner, e.g.,
> psocket(family, socktype, protocol, flags);
> psocketpair(d, type, protocol, int sv[2], flags);
While I agree, you missed the initial discussion where Alan, DaveM, and
Linus expressed preference for this overloading.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkgelFUACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHSt1ACgx5ksBu0jMDqZDcG01PmJ4Jel
EywAoKLQ8pEKcB+bY+vDzaOaZvLyPag0
=6iYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 3:42 [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: socket and socketpair Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-05 4:24 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2008-05-05 5:00 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2008-05-05 8:11 ` David Miller
2008-05-06 1:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 2:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-05-06 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 2:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-05-06 11:43 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-06 2:33 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-06 2:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 2:58 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-06 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 3:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-06 3:02 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481E9455.7030704@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).