From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] ip: factor out protocol delivery helper
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:35:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482631991107b8493fe7310c01d66b92@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06f628363fc53443f30f1d3120c5e844800b7718.1540920083.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
On 2018-10-30 11:24, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> So that we can re-use it at the UDP lavel in a later patch
>
Hi Paolo
Minor queries -
Should it be "level" instead of "lavel"? Similar comment for the ipv6
patch as well.
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/ip_input.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> index 35a786c0aaa0..72250b4e466d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> @@ -188,51 +188,50 @@ bool ip_call_ra_chain(struct sk_buff *skb)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static int ip_local_deliver_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> +void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> int protocol)
Would it be better if this function was declared in include/net/ip.h &
include/net/ipv6.h rather than in net/ipv4/udp.c & net/ipv6/udp.c as in
the patch "udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection"
diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
index 72593e1..3d7fdb4 100644
--- a/include/net/ip.h
+++ b/include/net/ip.h
@@ -717,4 +717,6 @@ static inline void ip_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg,
struct sk_buff *skb)
int rtm_getroute_parse_ip_proto(struct nlattr *attr, u8 *ip_proto,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
proto);
+
#endif /* _IP_H */
diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
index 8296505..4d4d2cfe 100644
--- a/include/net/ipv6.h
+++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
@@ -1101,4 +1101,8 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join_ssm(struct sock *sk, int
ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr, unsigned int
mode);
int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr);
+
+void ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
nexthdr,
+ bool have_final);
+
#endif /* _NET_IPV6_H */
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-01 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 17:24 [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] udp: implement GRO support Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/10] udp: implement complete book-keeping for encap_needed Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 20:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-02 13:30 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/10] udp: implement GRO for plain UDP sockets Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/10] udp: add support for UDP_GRO cmsg Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] ip: factor out protocol delivery helper Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 6:35 ` Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan [this message]
2018-11-02 13:30 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/10] ipv6: " Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection Paolo Abeni
2018-10-31 9:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 21:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-02 13:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/10] selftests: add GRO support to udp bench rx program Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/10] selftests: conditionally enable XDP support in udpgso_bench_rx Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 21:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/10] selftests: add some benchmark for UDP GRO Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/10] selftests: add functionals test " Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482631991107b8493fe7310c01d66b92@codeaurora.org \
--to=subashab@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).