From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Liblit Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10600] New: e1000 updates rx_bytes infrequently Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 00:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4827D947.8090804@acm.org> References: <20080505155502.3fb16590.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080505.161806.267621711.davem@davemloft.net> <481F9E64.6070606@acm.org> <1210036624.7941.183.camel@dell> <481FB33F.3040804@acm.org> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52051AAF84@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52051AB314@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Chan , David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, "Ronciak, John" To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" Return-path: Received: from smtp123.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([66.196.96.96]:28955 "HELO smtp123.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751551AbYELFvX (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2008 01:51:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52051AB314@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > and for e1000e (which you should be using for 82566) That seems unlikely. When I replace "alias eth0 e1000" with "alias eth0 e100e" in my module configuration I lose the network interface entirely. "ip link" does not mention it and it does not appear in "/sys/class/net". Switching back to "alias eth0 e1000" restores the ability to use the network interface. It seems pretty clear from my end that the e1000e driver is *not* recognizing and driving my Intel 82566DC ethernet device.