From: "Damon L. Chesser" <damon@damtek.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Fix FRTO+NewReno problem (Was: Re: This has a work around)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:55:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4828304F.4040908@damtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805121419330.1888@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Big snip
Ilpo,
I ran the first patch and received this error:
root@dam-main:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24.1# patch -p1 < ../1st_frto_patch.diff
patching file net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 17: @@ -1685,6 +1683,10 @@ static
inline void tcp_reset_reno_sack(struct tcp_sock *tp)
root@dam-main:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24.1#
below is the text of the patch.diff I have:
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 0298f80..5c503e0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ int sysctl_tcp_abc __read_mostly;
#define FLAG_FORWARD_PROGRESS (FLAG_ACKED|FLAG_DATA_SACKED)
#define FLAG_ANY_PROGRESS (FLAG_FORWARD_PROGRESS|FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED)
-#define IsSackFrto() (sysctl_tcp_frto == 0x2)
-
#define TCP_REMNANT (TCP_FLAG_FIN|TCP_FLAG_URG|TCP_FLAG_SYN|TCP_FLAG_PSH)
#define TCP_HP_BITS (~(TCP_RESERVED_BITS|TCP_FLAG_PSH))
@@ -1685,6 +1683,10 @@ static inline void tcp_reset_reno_sack(struct
tcp_sock *tp)
tp->sacked_out = 0;
}
static int tcp_is_sackfrto(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
{
return (sysctl_tcp_frto == 0x2) && !tcp_is_reno(tp);
}
/* F-RTO can only be used if TCP has never retransmitted anything other than
* head (SACK enhanced variant from Appendix B of RFC4138 is more robust
here)
*/
@@ -1701,7 +1703,7 @@ int tcp_use_frto(struct sock *sk)
if (icsk->icsk_mtup.probe_size)
return 0;
- if (IsSackFrto())
+ if (tcp_is_sackfrto(tp))
return 1;
/* Avoid expensive walking of rexmit queue if possible */
@@ -1791,7 +1793,7 @@ void tcp_enter_frto(struct sock *sk)
/* Earlier loss recovery underway (see RFC4138; Appendix B).
* The last condition is necessary at least in tp->frto_counter case.
*/
- if (IsSackFrto() && (tp->frto_counter ||
+ if (tcp_is_sackfrto(tp) && (tp->frto_counter ||
((1 << icsk->icsk_ca_state) & (TCPF_CA_Recovery|TCPF_CA_Loss))) &&
after(tp->high_seq, tp->snd_una)) {
tp->frto_highmark = tp->high_seq;
@@ -3123,7 +3125,7 @@ static int tcp_process_frto(struct sock *sk, int flag)
return 1;
}
- if (!IsSackFrto() || tcp_is_reno(tp)) {
+ if (!tcp_is_sackfrto(tp)) {
/* RFC4138 shortcoming in step 2; should also have case c):
* ACK isn't duplicate nor advances window, e.g., opposite dir
* data, winupdate
--
1.5.2.2
----------------
and in the name of completeness this is the patch file I have for the
2nd patch (in the event I did not copy all the correct code):
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 81ece1f..4c2255c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2481,7 +2481,7 @@ static void tcp_try_to_open(struct sock *sk, int flag)
tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
- if (tp->retrans_out == 0)
+ if (!tp->frto_counter && tp->retrans_out == 0)
tp->retrans_stamp = 0;
if (flag & FLAG_ECE)
--
1.5.2.2
--------------------------
Am I doing something wrong or have I missed something? Patched against
a 2.6.24.1 kernel from kernel.org
--
Damon L. Chesser
damon@damtek.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <48207F06.50306@damtek.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805061912350.8965@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
[not found] ` <4821C37A.7040306@damtek.com>
2008-05-07 22:26 ` Fix FRTO+NewReno problem (Was: Re: This has a work around) Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-08 8:10 ` Fix FRTO+NewReno problem David Miller
2008-05-08 16:50 ` Bug#478062: Fix FRTO+NewReno problem (Was: Re: This has a work around) Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-08 17:05 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-08 18:16 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-08 20:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 10:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <4828279C.3010102@damtek.com>
2008-05-12 11:32 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 11:55 ` Damon L. Chesser [this message]
2008-05-12 12:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 13:44 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-12 14:35 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 16:40 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 17:02 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-12 18:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 18:39 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-12 19:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 19:18 ` Damon L. Chesser
2008-05-12 19:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-12 22:48 ` Fix FRTO+NewReno problem David Miller
2008-05-13 9:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-13 9:49 ` David Miller
2008-05-13 10:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-05-13 10:08 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4828304F.4040908@damtek.com \
--to=damon@damtek.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).