From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:06:16 -0700 Message-ID: <482B0DF8.9060001@redhat.com> References: <20080513093718.GA24185@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20080513162325.GF15306@ghostprotocols.net> <20080513170325.GB11499@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <200805132037.39580.rdenis@simphalempin.com> <4829E87F.1070006@redhat.com> <20080514080942.GB4462@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <482AF1DB.1060608@redhat.com> <20080514144518.GA30578@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Gerrit Renker , Ulrich Drepper , R?mi Denis-Courmont , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Stevens < Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59157 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755180AbYENQLe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 12:11:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080514144518.GA30578@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit Renker wrote: > ... but it would still be good to have.=20 > [...] Thanks, but I think I got this already from previous mails. The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero? - -- =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro S= t =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIKw342ijCOnn/RHQRAmnrAKCO0sevJbyZXNoFG12jSg1NjPC+5wCfUlyH cLqvVRQ1gmTkkwl5JnqA9go=3D =3DQRU/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----