From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:43:41 -0700 Message-ID: <482B24CD.2040209@redhat.com> References: <20080513093718.GA24185@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20080513162325.GF15306@ghostprotocols.net> <20080513170325.GB11499@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <200805132037.39580.rdenis@simphalempin.com> <4829E87F.1070006@redhat.com> <20080514080942.GB4462@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <482AF1DB.1060608@redhat.com> <20080514144518.GA30578@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <482B0DF8.9060001@redhat.com> <20080514172204.GA1036@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Gerrit Renker , Ulrich Drepper , R?mi Denis-Courmont , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Stevens < Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59019 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762600AbYENRoS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 13:44:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080514172204.GA1036@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit Renker wrote: > But either is important be considered when a user unambiguously speci= fies > ai_socktype and/or ai_protocol; to avoid bad/brittle workarounds. OK, I added the support. Will be in glibc 2.9. But what about $subject? What is the story with SOCK_DCCP? I added it now but if it's going away I'd rather remove it. - -- =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro S= t =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIKyTN2ijCOnn/RHQRAhyWAJoDEgLDYcL/VUQyz5ykje2r4FWVFwCbBdvq U1W/yHRv5cAuuWr4927IGUw=3D =3DrjjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----