From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 16th 2008
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:19:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482DD047.7060907@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080516180426.GA3284@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:41:31AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> ...
>> Bug of the week
>> ---------------
>> Not in the top 10 (but barely not so), but upcoming fast is a bug that has a very
>> distinct pattern.
>> The backtraces are at http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=fput
>>
>> The pattern is that the kernel gets an invalid pointer passed to fput(),
>> coming down from a select() system call done by the "wpa_supplicant" program.
>> The fact that it is ONLY wpa_supplicant implicates the wireless/network stack.
>> Another observation is that this only happens with 64 bit kernels, even though
>> a large portion of the users uses 32 bit kernels. This implies that this is a 64-bit
>> type of bug. It appears that the top 32 bit of the pointers is getting corrupted
>> (the bottom part at least looks valid).
>> ...
>
> Unless I misunderstand your webinterface another pattern is a "fc9" in
> the version string.
that's because fc9 is the only OS that currently ships the client by default,
which means that it's a statistical thing where 90%+ of the reports come from
Fedora kernels, just because that's where the data is mined.
>
> My first guess would be that it might be a problem in some code that is
> only in Fedora kernels?
that may or may not be true, but we can't conclude that right now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-16 16:41 Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 16th 2008 Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-16 17:14 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-16 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-16 18:19 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-05-20 3:53 ` Dave Jones
[not found] <fa.LFS/TATb5YijFetLw6A+gczrVAQ@ifi.uio.no>
2008-05-17 1:55 ` Robert Hancock
2008-05-17 14:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-17 14:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-17 20:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-17 17:38 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <fa.d+EaKQa5MirlzoI/uZKGy3xe0h0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.TM0B9DZ+uvPYd9hbDhfuRgtReEk@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.aEHVuArwNEvL0BbdjUyZdMtgx5s@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Td5KtiJWRKP94D9KrvGd+GkHdW0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.wtWnOZVeQ06/16BVE5ml7FVHP+c@ifi.uio.no>
2008-05-19 2:23 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482DD047.7060907@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).