From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VIRTIO: Use __skb_queue_purge() Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 22:18:42 -0400 Message-ID: <48362982.1040205@pobox.com> References: <483545EF.3070501@cn.fujitsu.com> <200805231154.12188.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wang Chen , "David S. Miller" , NETDEV To: Rusty Russell Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:36840 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbYEWCSw (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 22:18:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200805231154.12188.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thursday 22 May 2008 20:07:43 Wang Chen wrote: >> Use standard routine for queue purging. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen > > Thanks, applied. > > Jeff, I'm planning on final testing of my 4 pending virtio_net patches for > 2.6.26 today: if all goes well, I'll send them in a neat batch. It seemed more applicable as a general netdev cleanup so I also applied it :) In general, regardless of bus topology or whatever, net driver patches tend to come in my direction. Jeff