* Re: [PATCH] devinet: sysctl setup off by one
[not found] <20080523153559.156a1fb5@speedy>
@ 2008-05-26 5:51 ` David Miller
2008-05-26 7:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-05-26 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stephen.hemminger; +Cc: xemul, netdev
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:35:59 -0700
> It look like the code to setup /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/XXX has an
> off by one bug that causes the last entry (arp_accept) not to be
> adjusted properly. This causes changes to the value to occur in the
> default namespace not the clone? Don't use network namespaces
> myself, but this looks like a bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Yikes, that is a very strange expression to be there by
accident.
Pavel, can you take a look at this? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] devinet: sysctl setup off by one
[not found] <20080523153559.156a1fb5@speedy>
2008-05-26 5:51 ` [PATCH] devinet: sysctl setup off by one David Miller
@ 2008-05-26 7:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-27 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Emelyanov @ 2008-05-26 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> It look like the code to setup /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/XXX has an off by one bug
> that causes the last entry (arp_accept) not to be adjusted properly. This causes
> changes to the value to occur in the default namespace not the clone? Don't use
> network namespaces myself, but this looks like a bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
> --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-05-23 15:23:19.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-05-23 15:29:17.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ static int __devinet_sysctl_register(str
> if (!t)
> goto out;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t->devinet_vars) - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t->devinet_vars); i++) {
> t->devinet_vars[i].data += (char *)p - (char *)&ipv4_devconf;
> t->devinet_vars[i].extra1 = p;
> t->devinet_vars[i].extra2 = net;
>
This off-by-one is required, since the very last element of this array
is used as a sentinel, that shows sysctl engine when to stop processing
the table.
Look, the sizeof(t->devinet_vars) is __NET_IPV4_CONF_MAX == 22, thus
entries 0, 1, ... 20 are tables and the 21-st is this sentinel, so the
initialization of this last entry, whose index is (this_sizeof() - 1),
is not required.
Thanks,
Pavel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] devinet: sysctl setup off by one
2008-05-26 7:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
@ 2008-05-27 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2008-05-27 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Emelyanov; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev
On Mon, 26 May 2008 11:39:21 +0400
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > It look like the code to setup /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/XXX has an off by one bug
> > that causes the last entry (arp_accept) not to be adjusted properly. This causes
> > changes to the value to occur in the default namespace not the clone? Don't use
> > network namespaces myself, but this looks like a bug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> >
> > --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-05-23 15:23:19.000000000 -0700
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2008-05-23 15:29:17.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ static int __devinet_sysctl_register(str
> > if (!t)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t->devinet_vars) - 1; i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t->devinet_vars); i++) {
> > t->devinet_vars[i].data += (char *)p - (char *)&ipv4_devconf;
> > t->devinet_vars[i].extra1 = p;
> > t->devinet_vars[i].extra2 = net;
> >
>
> This off-by-one is required, since the very last element of this array
> is used as a sentinel, that shows sysctl engine when to stop processing
> the table.
>
> Look, the sizeof(t->devinet_vars) is __NET_IPV4_CONF_MAX == 22, thus
> entries 0, 1, ... 20 are tables and the 21-st is this sentinel, so the
> initialization of this last entry, whose index is (this_sizeof() - 1),
> is not required.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
okay, so that means there is one extra entry in the vars than needed? which
is harmless.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-27 18:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080523153559.156a1fb5@speedy>
2008-05-26 5:51 ` [PATCH] devinet: sysctl setup off by one David Miller
2008-05-26 7:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-27 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).