From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:39:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48442239.7090906@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E4EB64C-0618-497E-AABC-74EB7D74B97F@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> The core portions of the phylib aren't capable of being used as
>>> a module. This isn't really any different than something like i2c
>>> in that the bus driver and core need to be built into the kernel.
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> ---
>>> Jeff, please consider this for 2.6.26 as w/o it we get build issues
>>> if phylib is config'd as a module on ppc.
>>> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> index 6eb2d31..ab04cc7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>> #
>>> menuconfig PHYLIB
>>> - tristate "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>> + bool "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>> depends on !S390
>>> depends on NET_ETHERNET
>>
>> What are the issues?
>>
>> The core _should_ be able to be built as a module.
>
> The core provides functions like phy_read/phy_write. Andy has recently
> introduced board level workaround/fixups. The problem is these
> workarounds tend to use phy_read/phy_write and the board/platform code
> is not built as modules.
>
> So we get errors like:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o: In function `mpc8568_mds_phy_fixups':
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:99:
> undefined reference to `phy_write'
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:104:
> undefined reference to `phy_read'
The whole world isn't embedded ppc, we use this stuff elsewhere too.
You guys need to figure out something that doesn't require phylib be
built-in on ALL platforms, but only the platforms that require it.
Or, update the platform to not require built-in -- convert the board
code to function pointers, and execute them later on somehow, for example.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-02 15:58 [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 16:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 16:25 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-02 16:39 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-06-02 19:19 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 20:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 23:06 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:30 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:44 ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-02 20:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 23:07 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 23:20 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 14:47 ` [RFC] Make board force selection of PHYLIB Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:10 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:14 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:18 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:31 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:36 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:40 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:56 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 18:07 ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-03 17:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-03 18:11 ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-03 18:23 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 15:19 ` [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module Grant Likely
2008-06-02 16:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-02 19:24 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 15:40 ` [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: MPC85xx MDS - Unconditionally select PHYLIB for board fixups Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 17:48 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48442239.7090906@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).