From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Miklautz Subject: Re: Veth problems with bridge Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:24:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4845621E.6080104@inqnet.at> References: <4845475A.7020207@inqnet.at> <48455240.8070102@trash.net> Reply-To: miklautz@inqnet.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, Linux Netdev List To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48455240.8070102@trash.net> Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Patrick, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Bernhard Miklautz wrote: >> [...] >> I also tried the whole setup without using veth; the IP directly bound >> to br0, as well as without the bridge at all. No problems with that. >> So there might be some problems with veth? > > Does "echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables" fix it? On my hardware machine this seems to fix the problem :). But why does bridge-nf-call-iptables influent source nat on an other interface? - Shouldn't the source address always be translated when an output interface is set (iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth3 -t nat -j MASQUERADE)? Thanks for you quick help. Best regards, Bernhard