netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 patch 1/2][NETNS] fix device renaming for sysfs
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:50:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48469D95.3050703@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1fxrtpg06.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> When a netdev is moved across namespaces with the 'dev_change_net_namespace' 
>> function, the 'device_rename' function is used to fixup kobject and refresh 
>> the sysfs tree. The device_rename function will call kobject_rename and this
>> one will check if there is an object with the same name and this is the case
>> because we are renaming the object with the same name.
>>
>> The use of 'device_rename' seems for me wrong because we usually don't
>> rename it but just move it across namespaces. As we just want to do a 
>> mini "netdev_[un]register", IMO the functions 'netdev_[un]register_kobject' 
>> should be used instead, like an usual network device [un]registering.
> 
> device_rename is correct.  Because doing device_del; device_add removes
> any driver specific sysfs attributes.
> 
> Causing your patch to introduce subtle driver breakage only when we
> move a network device between namespaces.  Ouch!
> 
> To support this operation we need something like device_rename that
> can preserve driver specific attributes, and generally handle
> movement between namespaces.  Since device_rename already does 99% of
> what we need it to do I found it easier to extend device_rename to
> handle this case then to introduce yet another function into the
> kobject layer.
> 
>> This patch replace device_rename by netdev_unregister_kobject, followed by
>> netdev_register_kobject.
> 
> And sysfs comes a' tumblin' down.
> My apologies for not replying sooner I just spotted this.

My fault, I should have Cc'ed you when sending the email :(
Thanks for looking at this patch.

   -- Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-30 21:31 [net-2.6 patch 0/2][NETNS] netns fixes Daniel Lezcano
2008-04-30 21:31 ` [net-2.6 patch 1/2][NETNS] fix device renaming for sysfs Daniel Lezcano
2008-05-03  0:01   ` David Miller
2008-06-04 11:59   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-06-04 13:50     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2008-04-30 21:31 ` [net-2.6 patch 2/2][NETNS] Fix reassembly timer to use the right namespace Daniel Lezcano
2008-05-03  0:02   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48469D95.3050703@fr.ibm.com \
    --to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).