From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor M Podlesny Subject: > OK, a reboot after a bug can sometimes prevent further data corruption/loss. Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:51:28 +0800 Message-ID: <48518C50.8050009@gmail.com> References: <43d009740806100736y343bad9bt3a8b365292cced49@mail.gmail.com> <4851116A.6040805@trash.net> <43d009740806120524g78d066d2x95640fc8e01be625@mail.gmail.com> <485115EE.1040204@trash.net> <48517ACD.4020209@gmail.com> <48517D1C.7010308@gmail.com> <20080612201548.GA2472@ami.dom.local> <485184BD.6030007@gmail.com> <20080612204933.GB2472@ami.dom.local> Reply-To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245]:28311 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759596AbYFLUwF (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:52:05 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so906151and.103 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080612204933.GB2472@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2008-06-13 04:49, Jarek Poplawski wrote: [...] > > OK, a reboot after a bug can sometimes prevent further data corruption/loss. :-) In general ("sometimes") it's obvious. I was asking bout that very case. --