From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: > OK, a reboot after a bug can sometimes prevent further data corruption/loss. Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:04:27 +0200 Message-ID: <48518F5B.1010905@gmail.com> References: <43d009740806100736y343bad9bt3a8b365292cced49@mail.gmail.com> <4851116A.6040805@trash.net> <43d009740806120524g78d066d2x95640fc8e01be625@mail.gmail.com> <485115EE.1040204@trash.net> <48517ACD.4020209@gmail.com> <48517D1C.7010308@gmail.com> <20080612201548.GA2472@ami.dom.local> <485184BD.6030007@gmail.com> <20080612204933.GB2472@ami.dom.local> <48518C50.8050009@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:2694 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255AbYFLVEh (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:04:37 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id h2so431803ugf.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:04:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48518C50.8050009@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Igor M Podlesny wrote, On 06/12/2008 10:51 PM: > On 2008-06-13 04:49, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > [...] >> OK, a reboot after a bug can sometimes prevent further data corruption/loss. > > :-) In general ("sometimes") it's obvious. I was asking bout that very case. > This case looks helpless to me...