netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auke Kok <auke@linux.intel.com>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:15:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4856C9ED.3070505@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080616193501.M64730@visp.net.lb>

Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi again
> 
> I moved from PCI Realtek 8169 to onboard PCI-Express e1000e, and situation
> become worse. Strange? Yes.
> 
> Here is info
> Load and error rate: 
> 
> MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # ifconfig eth1;sleep 10;ifconfig eth1
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:19:D1:71:5F:33
>           inet addr:192.168.20.10  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:91991642 errors:0 dropped:1803444 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:91914611 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:316112765 (301.4 MiB)  TX bytes:138303107 (131.8 MiB)
>           Memory:90300000-90320000
> 
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:19:D1:71:5F:33
>           inet addr:192.168.20.10  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:92812514 errors:0 dropped:1815490 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:92734865 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:739941322 (705.6 MiB)  TX bytes:560547138 (534.5 MiB)
>           Memory:90300000-90320000
> 
> System load (there is no NAT, no shapers, just routing, around 600-700 routes):
> MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # mpstat 1
> Linux 2.6.26-rc6-git2-build-0029 (MegaRouter-KARAM)     06/16/08
> 
> 22:36:36     CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  
> %idle    intr/s
> 22:36:37     all    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.49    0.00  
> 98.51  19764.00
> 22:36:38     all    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00  
> 99.01  19888.00
> 22:36:39     all    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00  
> 99.50  19642.00
> 22:36:40     all    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.01    9.05    0.00  
> 89.95  19543.00
> 
> (system almost idle)

but has 20000 interrupts per second! that's hardly idle by any account :)

what options did use to load e1000e? can you show the relevant dmesg parts? post
contents of /proc/interrupts?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-16 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16 19:37 packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169? Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 19:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:20   ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:23   ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:36     ` Kok, Auke
     [not found]       ` <20080616204411.M52834@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 20:49         ` Kok, Auke
2008-06-16 20:59           ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:13           ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:29             ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:41               ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:41               ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
     [not found]               ` <20080616213419.M212@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 21:41                 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:44                   ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 22:08                     ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17  2:17                       ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-17  2:47                         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 22:08                     ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 23:24                       ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17  1:53                         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17  6:46                         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 17:22                           ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18  0:58                             ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17 21:04                         ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18 16:50                           ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-18 17:03                             ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:17           ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:05         ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:52       ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:15 ` Auke Kok [this message]
2008-06-16 20:29   ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:26 ` Francois Romieu
2008-06-16 20:37 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-06-16 20:42   ` Denys Fedoryshchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4856C9ED.3070505@linux.intel.com \
    --to=auke@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).