netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	NETDEV <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-driver: Drivers don't set IFF_* flag [Was: [PATCH 3/3] netdevice: order of synchronization of IFF_PROMISC and IFF_ALLMULTI]
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:47:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <485FA962.5060704@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485FA635.4090903@cn.fujitsu.com>

Wang Chen wrote:
> Patrick McHardy said the following on 2008-6-23 19:04:
>> Did you check that these drivers don't use the PROMISC flag they
>> set themselves somewhere? As Jeff said, they might use it to be
>> aware of their hardware programming state.
>>
> 
> Yes. I checked.
> The flag is set but not be used anywhere else.
> All of the drivers set their own state and at the same time
> set IFF_PROMIDC flag.
> I think that by setting IFF_PROMISC the drivers want to inform
> upper layer that they set hardware to promisc although they are
> requested to set ALLMULTI.
> But the driver's redundant action is unneeded.
> Because, if the hardwares have to set promisc mode when they
> required to receive all multicast packets, it's ok, upper layer
> don't need to be informed.
> Only if allmulti and promiscuity all be zero, the promisc mode will be off.

OK, thanks for the explanation.

>>> @@ -5528,6 +5529,7 @@ de4x5_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq
>>> *rq, int cmd)
>>>      omr &= ~OMR_PR;
>>>      outl(omr, DE4X5_OMR);
>>>      dev->flags &= ~IFF_PROMISC;
>>> +    dev->promiscuity = 0;
>>>      break;
>> Shouldn't this be using dev_set_promiscuity().
>>

I actually meant dev_change_flags(), sorry.

> No.
> 1. dev_set_promiscuity do
>   a. set/unset IFF_PROMISC
>   b. promiscuity++/--
>   c. audit
>   d. dev_set_rx_mode (upload unicast and multicast list to device)
>   Here, in ioctl, a & b is enough.

Auditing should certainly be done if promiscous mode is set.
Calling dev_set_rx_mode doesn't hurt, even if it does the ioctl
handler could be changed not to care. Besides this is neither
taking the rtnl_mutex as required nor sending notifcations
to userspace.

> 2. dev->flags unset IFF_PROMISC and dev->promiscuity = 0 can not be
>    replaced by dev_set_promiscuity(). Because, we don't decrease
>    promiscuity here, but set promiscuity zero for unset IFF_PROMISC.

And that looks like a bug, the driver shouldn't disable
promiscuity if something still requires it.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-23 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16  9:17 [PATCH 3/3] netdevice: order of synchronization of IFF_PROMISC and IFF_ALLMULTI Wang Chen
2008-06-16  9:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-16  9:39   ` Wang Chen
2008-06-16 10:03     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-17  1:42       ` Wang Chen
2008-06-17 13:06         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-18  2:27           ` Wang Chen
2008-06-18  2:52             ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-18  3:22               ` Wang Chen
2008-06-20 15:07               ` [PATCH] net-driver: Drivers don't set IFF_* flag [Was: [PATCH 3/3] netdevice: order of synchronization of IFF_PROMISC and IFF_ALLMULTI] Wang Chen
2008-06-23 11:04                 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-23 13:33                   ` Wang Chen
2008-06-23 13:47                     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-06-23 14:44                       ` Wang Chen
2008-06-23 14:52                         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-24  1:02                           ` Wang Chen
2008-06-24  5:10                             ` Grant Grundler
2008-06-24  5:39                               ` Wang Chen
2008-06-27  1:14                                 ` v2 [PATCH 2/2] de4x5: Remove developer debug feature about set/clear promisc Wang Chen
2008-06-28 17:52                                   ` Grant Grundler
2008-06-30  3:24                                     ` v3 " Wang Chen
2008-07-02  4:22                                       ` Grant Grundler
2008-06-27  1:14                 ` v2 [PATCH 1/2] net-driver: Drivers don't set IFF_* flag Wang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=485FA962.5060704@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).