From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsc: add link layer overhead adaption Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:37:37 +0200 Message-ID: <485FFB81.5000804@trash.net> References: <20080623102514.15821.13979.stgit@fate.lan> <485F81B2.7000107@trash.net> <20080623142417.9gxuu3y9r4084s4c@hayate.ip6> <485F889E.1050901@trash.net> <20080623221522.jqh110t8o4cgss4o@hayate.ip6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jussi Kivilinna Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:60194 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752245AbYFWThl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:37:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080623221522.jqh110t8o4cgss4o@hayate.ip6> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > Quoting Patrick McHardy : > >>> >>> So would it be better if I add 'length table' to kernel&userspace >>> and use it instead? >> >> Yes, I even posted an unfinished patch for this one or two years >> ago, in response to the overhead calculation patches for HTB etc. >> >> I can't find it right now, but haven't tried too hard. It was >> called qdisc STABs (for size tables), you should be able to find >> it in the archives. > > Well, my LTAB didn't end up being exactly same your earlier STAB, but I > renamed LTAB to STAB as it sounds better. Hope you don't mind :] Not at all :) Did you already post that patch?