From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] pxa: make littleton to use the new smc91x platform data Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:58:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4864816F.5070407@garzik.org> References: <> <1214300867-15495-11-git-send-email-eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel , linux-netdev , Nicolas Pitre , Magnus Damm , Eric Miao To: Eric Miao Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55547 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752565AbYF0F6K (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:58:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1214300867-15495-11-git-send-email-eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Miao wrote: > From: Eric Miao > > Signed-off-by: Eric Miao > --- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/littleton.c | 9 +++++++++ > drivers/net/smc91x.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) The rest of the patches seem OK. What do ARM people prefer -- should I ACK this series, and let it be merged via an ARM tree? The series is mainly platform-oriented rather than net-oriented.