From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Miao Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] pxa: make littleton to use the new smc91x platform data Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:18:00 +0800 Message-ID: <48648618.5060900@gmail.com> References: <> <1214300867-15495-11-git-send-email-eric.y.miao@gmail.com> <4864816F.5070407@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel , linux-netdev , Nicolas Pitre , Magnus Damm , Eric Miao To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.235]:35034 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751288AbYF0GSM (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:18:12 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so406892rvb.1 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:18:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4864816F.5070407@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jeff Garzik wrote: > Eric Miao wrote: >> From: Eric Miao >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/littleton.c | 9 +++++++++ >> drivers/net/smc91x.h | 3 ++- >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > The rest of the patches seem OK. > > What do ARM people prefer -- should I ACK this series, and let it be > merged via an ARM tree? > Well, I guess there are still some smc91x patches around and I'm not sure if they will go inside the next merge window. So ideally, it'll be best for "smc91x: *" patches go through the net-2.6, and I can manage the rest to go through Russell's tree. If you are OK with this, I'll send the smc91x specific patches to you, together with Nico's Ack and a minor modification suggestion. And either way will work if you prefer this to go through Russell's arm tree. > The series is mainly platform-oriented rather than net-oriented. > > Yes, indeed.