From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-tx-2.6 PATCH]: Push TX lock down into drivers
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:06:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4864C9B7.4070003@gmail.com>
References: <20080625.013355.229057310.davem@davemloft.net> <20080626.023555.71060613.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:8259 "EHLO
	ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753112AbYF0LHC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:07:02 -0400
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id h2so364854ugf.16
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20080626.023555.71060613.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

David Miller wrote, On 06/26/2008 11:35 AM:
...

> I've also written up a blog
> entry about netdev TX locking at the usual spot:
> 
>       http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/cgi-bin/blog.cgi/index.html

...So, why exactly this nice lady didn't like new TX locking?

Regards,
Jarek P.