From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toyo Abe Subject: Re: [GIT PULL net-next-2.6] IPv6 Updates Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:46:58 +0900 Message-ID: <486BB102.7040409@miraclelinux.com> References: <20080702.123957.75682669.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <486B2208.2000104@miraclelinux.com> <20080702195934.754349fb.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?WU9TSElGVUpJIEhpZGVha2kgLyAbJEI1SEYjMVFMQBsoQg==?= , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Mitsuru Chinen Return-path: Received: from ns.miraclelinux.com ([219.118.163.66]:12960 "EHLO mail.miraclelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751005AbYGBQq4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:46:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080702195934.754349fb.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Chinen-san, Mitsuru Chinen wrote: >> I don't see why you set 1 as a default, so far. >> Any concerns on setting >1 as a default? > > You may want to read this discussion: > - Linux IPv6 DAD not full conform to RFC 4862 ? > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg52027.html > > The conclusion is: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg52095.html Now I see. Thank you for pointing. Regards, -toyo