From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: v3 [PATCH net-next 4/7] ipv6: Check return of dev_set_allmulti Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:20:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4871FBFC.2050408@trash.net> References: <48718014.4030009@cn.fujitsu.com> <4871814A.2070707@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , NETDEV , YOSHIFUJI Hideaki To: Wang Chen Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:57190 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752979AbYGGLUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:20:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4871814A.2070707@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Wang Chen wrote: > allmulti might overflow. > Commit: "netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti overflow" in net-next makes > dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti return error number if overflow happened. > > Here, we check the positive increment for allmulti to get error return. > > @@ -627,13 +633,14 @@ static int mif6_add(struct mif6ctl *vifc, int mrtsock) > if (!dev) > return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; > dev_put(dev); > + err = dev_set_allmulti(dev, 1); > + if (err) > + return err; The use of dev after putting it looks wrong, but thats already present before your patch. So ACK for your patch, but we need a fix on top.