From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: Persistent devices can get stuck in xoff state
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:15:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48752A86.3030207@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807091715.25464.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Max Krasnyansky:
>> The scenario goes like this. App stops reading from tun/tap.
>> TX queue gets full and driver does netif_stop_queue().
>> App closes fd and TX queue gets flushed as part of the cleanup.
>> Next time the app opens tun/tap and starts reading from it but
>> the xoff state is not cleared. We're stuck.
>> Normally xoff state is cleared when netdev is brought up. But
>> in the case of persistent devices this happens only during
>> initial setup.
>
> Thats interesting. I believe we have seen exactly this behaviour
> with KVM and lots of preallocated tap devices.
Yeah, it's interesting given that it's (the bug that is) been there for
at least 2-3 years now :).
> [...]
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -576,6 +576,11 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct file *file, struct ifreq
> *ifr)
>> file->private_data = tun;
>> tun->attached = 1;
>>
>> + /* Make sure persistent devices do not get stuck in
>> + * xoff state */
>> + if (netif_running(tun->dev))
>> + netif_wake_queue(tun->dev);
>> +
>> strcpy(ifr->ifr_name, tun->dev->name);
>> return 0;
>
> I think that patch looks ok, but I am curious why you dont clear the xoff
> state on application close at the same time when the TX queue gets flushed?
Why bother. I mean the packets will be dropped anyway.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 6:24 [PATCH] tun: Persistent devices can get stuck in xoff state Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-09 15:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-07-09 21:15 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-07-09 15:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-07-09 21:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 0:00 ` David Miller
2008-07-11 0:53 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48752A86.3030207@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).