From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for device classes. Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:07:55 +0900 Message-ID: <48813E6B.30108@gmail.com> References: <486DD650.3000804@gmail.com> <486E2C3B.6020603@gmail.com> <20080704161200.GA1440@suse.de> <487D6A24.9070001@gmail.com> <20080717230857.GB28377@suse.de> <48808F79.7080607@gmail.com> <20080718184936.GA21343@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Linux Containers , Benjamin Thery , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Return-path: Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:19813 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751152AbYGSBII (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:08:08 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b6so402262tic.23 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:08:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080718184936.GA21343@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, Greg. Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 09:41:29PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >>> Ok, I'll work to get these in where applicable. >> Did this get into 2.6.27? Or will this have to wait till .28? > > I haven't sent any patches to Linus yet for 2.6.27, so it hasn't gotten > there yet. > > And due to the intrusiveness, and the fact that this hasn't been tested > at all in any build tree yet, I can't in good concious submit this for > .27 either. > > Part of this is my fault, I know, due to vacation and work, but also > lots is due to the fact that the code showed up so late in the > development cycle. Heh... A lot of it is my fault too. Probably my share is bigger than anyone else's. Sorry Eric. > I'll add it to my tree, and get it some testing in the next cycle of > linux-next until 2.6.27 is out, and then if it's still looking good, go > into .28. I was just curious how the merge will turn out as I'm about to do a refresh pass on the sysfs locking and stuff. I'm not sure yet whether to put those changes on top of or below ns patches but if I'll always keep the ns patches updated. Thank you. -- tejun