From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG, NET] deadlock tearing down a bridged interface
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:01:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48821DEF.1040306@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080719011709.GA5947@disturbed>
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 08:44:58AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I just deadlocked networking on a 2.6.24 kernel. Basically I
>>> was trying to restart the bridge interface I use for UML sessions
>>> because it wasn't passing packets. This happens occasionally
>>> when I leave a UML session too long in gdb, so I bounced the
>>> bridge to get it working again.
>>>
>>>
>> We have been chasing a refcount bug in 2.6.25 that only happens when
>> IPv6 module is loaded.
>>
>
> Which causes what problem? The deadlock I reported or the bridge occasionally
> hanging? Is that a problem in 2.6.24?
>
> The deadlock is the one I'm concerned about - it appears that
> netdev_run_todo() can only wait on a single interface at a time,
> so if we are tearing down two interfaces concurrently where one
> has a reference on the other a deadlock is just waiting to happen...
>
Our problem is the refcount hang while trying to remove a netdevice. It
appears
to be an ipv6 related leakage of some sort, and not directly related to
bridges.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-19 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 7:37 [BUG, NET] deadlock tearing down a bridged interface Dave Chinner
2008-07-18 15:44 ` Ben Greear
2008-07-19 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-19 17:01 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2008-07-20 6:04 ` [RFC] netdev: debugging option Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-20 7:05 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 16:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-04 21:31 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 22:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-20 6:07 ` [BUG, NET] deadlock tearing down a bridged interface Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48821DEF.1040306@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).