public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: Status of orphaned ltq_etop ethernet driver: mainline vs. OpenWRT
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 18:19:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <489999a0-b99d-4b72-976f-4f646f01be08@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d80fef86-ba14-4bd4-bce5-4d61a75d591b@hauke-m.de>

On 1/29/2026 1:04 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 1/28/26 21:23, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> This driver in mainline lost its in-tree user with commit
>> cd93b4895ea5 ("MIPS: lantiq: drop mips_machine support")
>> in 2012. Since then it has had no in-tree user.
>>
>> Only (?) user seems to be OpenWRT, with several changes to
>> the in-tree driver version:
>> target/linux/lantiq/patches-6.12/035-owrt-lantiq-wifi-and-ethernet-eeprom-handling.patch
>> target/linux/lantiq/patches-6.12/028-NET-lantiq-various-etop-fixes.patch
>> target/linux/lantiq/patches-6.12/701-NET-lantiq-etop-of-mido.patch
>> So it seems the driver is maintained in OpenWrt only
>> (except tree-wide in-tree changes).
>>
>> To me this leaves two questions:
>> - Move this driver to OpenWRT completely?
>> - Or mainline all downstream changes, maintain driver in
>>    mainline, and mainline also the users of this driver?
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think dropping this from the mainline kernel is fine, if it causes efforts for you.
> This is the Ethernet of the Lantiq Danube SoC, the SoC is probably EoL since 15 years. I assume that all users either use the vendor SDK with Linux 2.6.X or OpenWrt.
> 
> I will not spend much effort on this driver and others will probably also not spend much effort. We can move it completely into OpenWrt and keep it running there.
> 
Great, thanks for the prompt reply. Then I'll submit a patch for
removing this driver from mainline.

> Hauke

Heiner

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-29 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-28 20:23 Status of orphaned ltq_etop ethernet driver: mainline vs. OpenWRT Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-29  0:04 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2026-01-29 17:19   ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2026-01-30  0:07   ` Rosen Penev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=489999a0-b99d-4b72-976f-4f646f01be08@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox