From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl
Subject: Re: cat /proc/net/tcp takes 0.5 seconds on x86_64
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:32:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B44C3F.6020006@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080826163719.GA25066@redhat.com>
Dave Jones a écrit :
> Just had this bug reported against our development tree..
>
> Dave
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:49:31AM -0400, bugzilla@redhat.com wrote:
> > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
> > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459782
> >
> > Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CC| |j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl
> > Component|gkrellm |kernel
> > AssignedTo|j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl |kernel-maint@redhat.com
> > Summary|gkrellmd consumes about 75% |cat /proc/net/tcp takes 0.5
> > |cpu time |seconds on x86_64, 0.5
> > | |seconds !!
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> 2008-08-26 11:49:30 EDT ---
> > Thanks for reporting this some stracing of gkrellmd has found that reading from
> > /proc/net/tcp and reading from /proc/net/tcp6 is the culprit, try this on your
> > x86_64 machine to confirm:
> >
> > "time cat /proc/net/tcp"
> >
> > To give you an idea on my rawhide x86_64 machine:
> > [hans@localhost devel]$ time cat /proc/net/tcp
> > <snip>
> > real 0m0.520s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.446s
> >
> > Thats amazingly slow, esp as I only have 8 tcp connections open.
> >
> > Some maybe usefull info: top reports a very high load (50%) from soft IRQ's.
> >
> > Anyways changing this to a kernel bug.
>
I wonder why this qualifies as a "kernel bug". This is a well known problem.
At least, current kernel versions no longer block softirq for long periods while doing this...
cat /proc/net/tcp is slow and deprecated, since it uses a O(N^2) algo.
tcp hash table size might be a litle bit too large for typical setups (few tcp session, even on a 16 GB machine)
Unfortunatly it is fixed at boot time and not dynamic (yet)
You can :
1) Boot your machine with a boot cmd "thash_entries=1024" to reduce size of TCP hash table
(typical size on a 4GB machine is : TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes))
(max size is 524288 entries for machines with >= 8GB memory if no "thash_entries=..." specified, since October 2007
see http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2007/10/26/359198 )
2) Switch to netlink interface instead of /proc/net/tcp[6] legacy file.
Example : netstat -N
http://www.ducksong.com/misc/netstat-netlink-diag-patch.txt
3) Use both 1) & 2) :)
4) Submit a patch to dynamically grow tcp hash table :)
Links:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2007/11/1/375782
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2007/11/1/376907
Time difference between /proc/net/tcp and netlink on a 4GB x86_64 machine :
# dmesg | grep "TCP established hash"
TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
# time cat /proc/net/tcp >/dev/null
real 0m0.091s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.090s
# time ss -n >/dev/null # ss uses netlink interface
real 0m0.022s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.022s
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-459782-176318@bugzilla.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200808261549.m7QFnVUN032543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>
2008-08-26 16:37 ` cat /proc/net/tcp takes 0.5 seconds on x86_64 Dave Jones
2008-08-26 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-08-26 19:01 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-26 20:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-26 20:58 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-26 21:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 9:14 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 9:05 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 9:45 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 9:39 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 4:19 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-27 9:07 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 12:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 21:29 ` Trent Piepho
2008-08-27 21:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 21:29 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-27 22:09 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 6:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 6:51 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:57 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 9:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:34 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:39 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 23:07 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 23:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 23:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 23:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 23:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 23:45 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 0:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-28 7:59 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 8:12 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-28 8:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B44C3F.6020006@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).