From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cat /proc/net/tcp takes 0.5 seconds on x86_64
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:39:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B469EA.1010807@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B452ED.1000308@hhs.nl>
Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Dave Jones a écrit :
>>> Just had this bug reported against our development tree..
> <snip>
>>> > [hans@localhost devel]$ time cat /proc/net/tcp
>>> > <snip>
>>> > real 0m0.520s
>>> > user 0m0.000s
>>> > sys 0m0.446s
>>> > > Thats amazingly slow, esp as I only have 8 tcp connections open.
>>> > > Some maybe usefull info: top reports a very high load (50%)
>>> from soft IRQ's.
>>> > > Anyways changing this to a kernel bug.
>>>
>>
>> I wonder why this qualifies as a "kernel bug". This is a well known
>> problem.
>>
>
> No its not, /proc/net/tcp may be slow in general but not *this* slow ...
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> Time difference between /proc/net/tcp and netlink on a 4GB x86_64
>> machine :
>>
>> # dmesg | grep "TCP established hash"
>> TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
>> # time cat /proc/net/tcp >/dev/null
>>
>> real 0m0.091s
>> user 0m0.001s
>> sys 0m0.090s
>
> As quoted above my idle x86_64, using the exact same hash table size,
> running 2.6.27-rc2.git1 uses 0.520 seconds for that same command, thats
> a difference of more then a factor 50 !!
>
> This is not about /proc/net/tcp not being fast, this is about it haven
> gotten slower by a factor of 50!
>
> Also notice that this slowdown does not happen on i386.
And your .config files on i386 and x86_64 are ?
Some configuration options can slow down all lock/unlock operations (CONFIG_SMP, CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_NR_CPUS ...)
If you TCP hash table has 512.000 slots (I am just guessing, you didnt provide this information), it can make a huge difference.
>
> Anyways I'll try 2.6.27-rc4 and report back with its results.
>
Yes, please, but nothing really changed in this area in the recent times...
We added some checks so that softirqs can preempt us.
Latencies used to be very high, and are now bonded, at the price of potential slowdown for the /proc/net/tcp reader.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-459782-176318@bugzilla.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200808261549.m7QFnVUN032543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>
2008-08-26 16:37 ` cat /proc/net/tcp takes 0.5 seconds on x86_64 Dave Jones
2008-08-26 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-26 19:01 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-26 20:39 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-08-26 20:58 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-26 21:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 9:14 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 9:05 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 9:45 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 9:39 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 4:19 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-27 9:07 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-27 12:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 21:29 ` Trent Piepho
2008-08-27 21:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 21:29 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-27 22:09 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 6:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 6:51 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:57 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 9:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:34 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 22:39 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 23:07 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 23:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 23:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 23:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27 23:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-27 23:45 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 0:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 7:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-28 7:59 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 8:12 ` Hans de Goede
2008-08-28 8:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B469EA.1010807@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).