netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Turn part of SNMP accounting macros into functions
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:12:39 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B68827.2060105@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B589B5.7050303@cosmosbay.com>

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov a écrit :
>> After turning IP_XXX_STATS, TCP_XXX_STATS and NET_XXX_STATS from
>> macros into functions the net/ipv4/built-in.o shrank significantly:
>>
>> add/remove: 14/0 grow/shrink: 0/67 up/down: 482/-2246 (-1764)
>>
>> Turning the CONFIG_NET_NS option on makes this shrink even larger:
>>
>> add/remove: 14/0 grow/shrink: 0/67 up/down: 478/-2646 (-2168)
>>
>> So the question is - what was the reason to keep those as macros?
>> I thought about the possible performance questions, but netperf
>> didn't show any (I admit I just cannot cook it properly).
>>
>> The sample patch is here, but it's not good (EXPORTs for ipv6
>> and a better place for functions rather than net/ipv4/af_inet.c
>> are required).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>>
> 
> 
> I dont know, but passing all those "struct net *net" to every 
> network function in the kernel sounds overkill, especially for
> !CONFIG_NET_NS users. This is pure bloat.
> 
> We could define two macros so that function prototypes dont include
> useless pointers, especially on arches where only first and second
> parameter is passed in eax and edx register ;)
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> # define VNETPTR ,struct net *net
> # define NETPTR  net
> #else
> # define VNETPTR
> # defint NETPTR  &init_net
> #endif
> 
> ...
> void TCP_DEC_STATS(int field VNETPTR);
> ...
> void TCP_DEC_STATS(int field VNETPTR)
> {
> 	SNMP_DEC_STATS((NETPTR)->mib.tcp_statistics, field);
> }
> ...

I agree with this, but I've checked whether compiling out the first argument
of XXX_STATS would help and found out that there's almost no difference (-9
bytes) in the net/ipv4/built-in.o for NET_NS=n case. 

After turning the macros into functions, compiling the first argument out gives
us 500 more bytes out. Good catch, but I have a question - the way you proposed
to implement the function itself is rather nice, but how would you implement
the *call* to that function in order to make it variable-arguments depending on
the config option?

I see the similar way:

+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
+#define NET_ARG(net) net,
+#else
+#define NET_ARG(net)
+#endif
...
-	TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), field);
+	TCP_INC_STATS(NET_ARG(sock_net(sk) field);

but do these 500 bytes compensate for this ugly style?

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-28 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-27 16:31 [RFC][PATCH] Turn part of SNMP accounting macros into functions Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-27 16:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-27 16:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-27 17:09   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-27 17:58     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-27 17:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 11:12   ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-08-28 12:51     ` Eric Dumazet
2008-08-28 12:54       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-29  7:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-29  7:29   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-29 12:57   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48B68827.2060105@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).