From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Yasevich Subject: Re: [RESEND] [RFC PATCH] bonding: Do not tx-balance some IPv6 packets on ALB/TLB bonds Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:21:33 -0400 Message-ID: <48BE9D6D.7080600@hp.com> References: <48B6FEC1.7090508@hp.com> <20080829.140806.130290207.davem@davemloft.net> <48BE9AED.5070306@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.44]:33377 "EHLO g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753531AbYICOV4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:21:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48BE9AED.5070306@pobox.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jeff Garzik wrote: > David Miller wrote: >> From: Vlad Yasevich >> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:38:41 -0400 >> >>> It's been more then a month and still no replies. Is this just >>> not interesting, or did this get lost in the shuffle... >>> >>> Please take a look. This patch makes ALB/TLB modes work much more >>> reliably with IPv6. >> >> Jeff, or someone, please be sure to pick this up. > > For 2.6.27-rc, I presume? > > Fine by me. Thanks -vlad