From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Snook Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:25:36 -0400 Message-ID: <48C6DBC0.6020001@redhat.com> References: <48C6052D.2080203@redhat.com> <87zlmhs7we.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <48C6C300.4050102@redhat.com> <20080909.125934.150042096.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41664 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751628AbYIIU2L (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 16:28:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080909.125934.150042096.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > Still waiting for your test program and example traces Chris. > > Until I see that there really isn't anything more I can contribute > concretely to this discussion. No problem. Right now I'm working on testing the target workloads with the tunables Andi posted, but I'll also work up a trivial test case to demonstrate it. The apps where these problems are being reported are not exactly the sort of thing one posts to netdev. -- Chris