From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Subject: Re: [PATCH] cs89x0: add support for i.MX31ADS ARM board Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:54:54 +0200 Message-ID: <48CFAC9E.5000906@xenomai.org> References: <489DD049.6020106@xenomai.org> <48CC5B03.2020003@garzik.org> <20080914120358.GA26748@xi.wantstofly.org> <48CD1C19.60803@xenomai.org> <20080916124422.GC18556@xi.wantstofly.org> <48CFAAE5.80805@xenomai.org> <20080916125228.GA19104@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from xenomai.org ([88.191.250.36]:39173 "EHLO xenomai.fsffrance.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467AbYIPMy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:54:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080916125228.GA19104@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Lennert Buytenhek wrote: >>>> Hi Lennert, >>>> >>>> When I published this patch, I had access to an i.MX31ADS board, and >>>> getting Linux to work on this board was just a necessity to get my job >>>> done. I did this by copying the parts I needed working (the serial >>>> console and ethernet driver) from the Freescale tree. >>>> >>>> Now, I am no longer working on this, so I can not test any modification. >>>> And I do not even know why people at Freescale did what they did. >>> I guess then we should just wait until the Freescale people submit it. >> I will be able to test the modification soon. I will repost the patch on >> linux-arm-kernel after this test. > > OK. Please also try leaving reset_chip() as it is and see if it still > works like that -- I suspect that that part of the patch might have been > a debug leftover. Yes, that is precisely the part I want to test. -- Gilles.